
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
| 31 | ||||||
Philadelphia Inquirer reader, Mary Cantell asks:How is it that scientists can examine a rock specimen from Mars and "affirm" that there was once water on Mars (which has no water), and look at our planet, which is 70 percent water, and declare that there is no evidence of a worldwide flood?
...errr...
OK, one comment: perhaps the same way they can look at an apple and not call it an orange.
And that pesky thing of there being no evidence - none! - of a global flood.
If you ever wonder just how more than half of his country can believe in creationism and doubt evolution, take a moment to think of the Mary Cantells of the world, hang your head low, and weep, friends, weep for all that wasted brain matter.