The World Wide Rant


E-MAIL

Click Here


December 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            






MONTHLY ARCHIVES

December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
May 2002
March 2002


LAST 10 ENTRIES

Change of Tone
Cognitive Dissonance
Hyvää Itsenäisyyspäivää!
Light a Match, Would Ya?
Apparently the War in Iraq is Going "Fair to Middlin', Pass The Collards"
One of These Days, NASA
Stardust to Stardust
No, I am Not Tempting Google, Why do You ask?
Sleepyhead
Pushin' Forward Back*


« Backlash? | Main | Heh »



July 26, 2005

Risky Business

I realize that space travel is a dangerous endeavor, fraught with peril and things that go bump on the hull, but this seems of little comfort:

With a new realism born of disaster, NASA says that the risk of catastrophic failure during the space shuttle Discovery's mission is about 1 in 100, more than twice as great as an upbeat estimate issued before the loss of the Columbia in 2003.

The rise in estimated danger, Mr. Beutel said, came about "because we have a better understanding" of the craft's workings and limitations. He emphasized, though, that "it's a statistical probability, as opposed to what is going to happen." (The actual rate of catastrophic failure - as opposed to the calculated risk - now stands at 2 flights in 113, or 1 in 57.)

As a comparison (and a rather oogy gooey one), the chance of complications if my wife were to deliver World Wide Rant, Too the "natural way," due to a past c-section, is about 1 in 100.

Such complications would, at best, result in an emergency c-section and, at worst, loss of the child and a possible hysterectomy. We said "screw that" and are going for a schedueld c-section once again.

These astronauts are taking a similar chance, knowing full well that the outcome of failure is most likely catastrophic - they've got some serious balls on them. Big old brass balls that sway in the wind and clang together with a resounding thunder.

Astronauts rock.

Although it'd be nice if we could retire the Shuttles and pursue better technologies for space travel, rather than ones developed when we all oohed and ahhed over Farrah Fawcett and Lee Majors*.

* Not that I have a thing for Lee Majors, of course. Although I did have that cool Six Million Dollar Man toy with bionic eye and the arm that went clickity-click with the roll-up rubber sleeve hiding his supa-dupa 1970s cyborg wiring. Say, remember that Lindsey Wagner and her bionic dog?

Posted by Andy at 08:18 AM





MONKEY BUSINESS








THE BLOGROLL