The World Wide Rant


E-MAIL

Click Here


December 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            






MONTHLY ARCHIVES

December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
May 2002
March 2002


LAST 10 ENTRIES

Facelift?
Change of Tone
Cognitive Dissonance
Hyvää Itsenäisyyspäivää!
Light a Match, Would Ya?
Apparently the War in Iraq is Going "Fair to Middlin', Pass The Collards"
One of These Days, NASA
Stardust to Stardust
No, I am Not Tempting Google, Why do You ask?
Sleepyhead


« A Sick Man | Main | Spam, Wonderful Spam »



February 12, 2005

Which Part of "Free Market" Do They Not Understand?

First it was McCain sticking the federal nose into the private affairs of professional sports, and now it's Rhode Island:

Sen. Roger Badeau said he is fed up with athletes charging upwards of $100 for an autograph at large-scale autograph signing events. What really irks him is that children have to pay for the signatures of their sports heroes.

Badeau's bill would ban professional athletes, entertainers or promoters from charging a fee for an autograph to a child under age 16. They would be fined $100 for each violation.

Badeau said it didn't matter that some of those signed baseballs and bats will end up online or with sports memorabilia dealers. He said it still sends the wrong message.

The wrong message apparently being that no one, even a child, has a right to your labors, no matter how minimal, for free.

Update: And from England, we have this:

A new credit card aimed at millions of low-income families is to charge interest at up to 70% - the highest ever charged by a credit card company.

But Debt on our Doorstep said it will now increase pressure on the government to amend the consumer credit bill to include a clause allowing the government to impose a maximum interest rate cap.

Right, because credit card companies shouldn't be allowed to balance the interest rate they charge with the credit risk a borrower presents. We wouldn't want to send the message of "you are responsible for your finances," now would we?

Posted by Andy at 12:07 PM





MONKEY BUSINESS








THE BLOGROLL