
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
| 31 | ||||||
When I saw this photo with this story, my first thought was:
Hmmm, looks like a toy soldier. And a toy gun pointed at him. Photographed up close and blurry.Drudge is asking the same question; here's hoping it really is a toy and that the insurgents aren't just really crappy photographers who don't know how to use their camera lens.
Hope, hope, hope.
Update: Astute observations from a CNN military analyst:
He told CNN in a phone interview that the flak jacket in the picture had a kind of trim along the edges that he'd never seen before, and that the open-legged pants, as opposed to gathered hems, struck him as odd.Apparently the fact that it looked like a toy didn't seem very important.He also questioned what appeared to be camouflage paint on the face.
More Thoughts from Me: No idea why, but the name of the "soldier" was supposedly John Adam - the initials of which are J.A. - which could mean Jackass, which could mean Johnny Knoxville is behind it. Of course, that's probably a complete bunch of hooey, but it came through my mind with the ease of 6 pounds of Olestra in the colon of an IBS sufferer.
Yes, that was unnecessarily graphic and nasty. I apologize.