The World Wide Rant


E-MAIL

Click Here


December 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            






MONTHLY ARCHIVES

December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
May 2002
March 2002


LAST 10 ENTRIES

Facelift?
Change of Tone
Cognitive Dissonance
Hyvää Itsenäisyyspäivää!
Light a Match, Would Ya?
Apparently the War in Iraq is Going "Fair to Middlin', Pass The Collards"
One of These Days, NASA
Stardust to Stardust
No, I am Not Tempting Google, Why do You ask?
Sleepyhead


« Liveblogging the Veeps | Main | Quotables »



October 05, 2004

One Nation, Indivisible

Article VI, Clause 3: The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.Unless, that is, you call Estes Park home.

I decided to send Ms. Lori Jeffrey-Clark an e-mail about the issue:

Is religious bigotry alive and well in Colorado?

Judging by the 9news story I just read, the answer - at least in terms of you, Ms. Jeffrey-Clark - is a resounding "yes."

I am curious to know if, during the elections for Estes Park Town Trustee, anyone asked the candidates:

"Do you believe in God, and, if so, do you believe He should be honored via the Pledge of Allegiance?"

I honestly can't say I know the answer, but based on past experience I am willing to venture that the answer is "no."

So, where do you find the grounds to state:

"You know we're all elected and we're all supposed to lay it out on the table, who and what we stand for..."

Did Mr. Habecker lie about who he was and what he believed? Did he lead anyone to think he was a Bible-thumping, atheist-hating zealot? You might have assumed such (religious people often assume all the world is Christian), but I doubt Mr. Habecker ever misled anyone.

Or did he simply do the right thing by seeking to contribute to his society, by aiming to make a difference, and by desiring to ensure that all people, regardless of faith or lack of it, were properly represented?

I see you have, by your record, served your country with honor, and for that I thank you; however I find it hypocritical to lambaste another Trustee for embracing the freedom of religion that you and your fellow servicemen and -women have long protected.

Further, I find your husband's statements that Mr. Habecker has no right to serve on the board to be an insult to everything these United States and her people stand for. He should be ashamed.

In closing, I would direct you to read, if you have not, the Constitution of the United States of America, Article VI, Clause 3, regarding religious tests for public office, and then tell me how what you are suggesting differs from a test of one's religion

Have a wonderful day, and I look forward to your response.
I'm nice as pie, I am. Let's see what happens.





Posted by Andy at 09:07 PM





MONKEY BUSINESS








THE BLOGROLL