The World Wide Rant


E-MAIL

Click Here


December 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            






MONTHLY ARCHIVES

December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
May 2002
March 2002


LAST 10 ENTRIES

Facelift?
Change of Tone
Cognitive Dissonance
Hyvää Itsenäisyyspäivää!
Light a Match, Would Ya?
Apparently the War in Iraq is Going "Fair to Middlin', Pass The Collards"
One of These Days, NASA
Stardust to Stardust
No, I am Not Tempting Google, Why do You ask?
Sleepyhead


« Giddyup, Giddyap or Whatever | Main | Canned Spam »



March 30, 2004

Hey, It Was Good Enough for Isaac

From the World Wide Rant "voices in your head" bureau:

In opening statements Monday, a Texas prosecutor described how a mother smashed the head of her infant son with a rock and then led her two older boys outside and did the same to them, killing the two oldest boys...

[Attorney] Files said Laney believed that God had told her the world was going to end and "she had to get her house in order," which included killing her children.

"The dilemma she faced is a terrible one for a mother," Files said. "Does she follow what she believes to be God's will, or does she turn her back on God?"

Files said he would present witnesses who would corroborate Laney's love of her children as well as her belief "that the word of God was infallible."

"It destroyed her ability to discern the wrongness of her act," he said.

Naturally, the non-murdering Christians among us will proclaim that this was not the voice of God telling her to do this. Unfortunately, they have absolutely no grounds on which to say that other than their sheer distaste for wanton slaughter, a distaste which Yahweh - if you believe the reports from days of old - has never really seemed to share.

If you believe in God, no one bats an eye. If you believe in God and claim he says nice things or impresses upon your heart that you should pet puppy dogs and feed the hungry, some might think you're a bit off, but generally no big deal. However, if you believe in God and go out and do his apparent bidding, which happens to involve bludgeoning children with rocks, suddenly you're a pariah among the religious.

But how do you know it wasn't God telling her to do it? Obviously, as an atheist, I think she's a right looney - but on what rational ground can a Christian say it wasn't the Big Guy Upstairs encouraging her to do this? Disgust won't cut it. Faith? Not much of an argument, at least if we're looking for reason. Morality? If good is whatever God says it is, then killing can be good (and God, as I've said, has shown a penchant for spilling blood).

If it all boils down to "God wouldn't do that," on what basis can one make that claim, particularly about the all-powerful creator of everything? Who are you to judge the Lord your God?

Just askin'.

(yes, I'm in one of those moods - why do you ask?)

Posted by Andy at 08:39 AM





MONKEY BUSINESS








THE BLOGROLL