The World Wide Rant


E-MAIL

Click Here


December 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            






MONTHLY ARCHIVES

December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
May 2002
March 2002


LAST 10 ENTRIES

Facelift?
Change of Tone
Cognitive Dissonance
Hyvää Itsenäisyyspäivää!
Light a Match, Would Ya?
Apparently the War in Iraq is Going "Fair to Middlin', Pass The Collards"
One of These Days, NASA
Stardust to Stardust
No, I am Not Tempting Google, Why do You ask?
Sleepyhead


« DRINK UP | Main | Well, that's interesting... »



April 07, 2003

Free speech?

I'm not sure how I feel about this ruling from the Supreme Court:

WASHINGTON — A divided Supreme Court upheld a state ban on cross burning, ruling Monday that the history of racial intimidation attached to this symbol outweighs the free speech protection of Ku Klux Klansmen or others.
On one hand, I think if it is your cross on your property, then it's your right to do with it as you wish. On the other hand, a burning cross is easily interpreted as a threat of physical violence against a specific person or persons, which is and should be illegal.

Thoughts?

I wonder how long until someone tries to compare my desire to prevent physical violence among citizens to my support for a war in Iraq. I give it a couple hours, tops. As I've previously covered the issue of using coercion to instill property rights versus the use of coercion to violate property rights, I won't bother doing it again.

Posted by Andy at 09:11 AM





MONKEY BUSINESS








THE BLOGROLL