Comments on: Hey, Look! http://www.worldwiderant.com/2007/04/21/hey-look/ ...pardon our progress! Thanks, The Management. Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:29:41 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: PatrickP http://www.worldwiderant.com/2007/04/21/hey-look/#comment-1574 PatrickP Wed, 25 Apr 2007 07:14:26 +0000 http://www.worldwiderant.com/2007/04/21/hey-look/#comment-1574 Ok, more of a point of discussion, but isn't all theology theoretical? Ok, more of a point of discussion, but isn’t all theology theoretical?

]]> By: andy http://www.worldwiderant.com/2007/04/21/hey-look/#comment-1553 andy Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:28:43 +0000 http://www.worldwiderant.com/2007/04/21/hey-look/#comment-1553 "theological theory" That's cute. :-) How exactly does one test such a theory? “theological theory”

That’s cute. :-)

How exactly does one test such a theory?

]]> By: PatrickP http://www.worldwiderant.com/2007/04/21/hey-look/#comment-1540 PatrickP Tue, 24 Apr 2007 04:55:49 +0000 http://www.worldwiderant.com/2007/04/21/hey-look/#comment-1540 Limbo was never doctrine, just a theological theory developed as a means of addressing the problem of infants and other innocents who died without benefit of baptism. Limbo is not to be confused with Purgatory. Julie, God doesn't have an "age of consent." Humans do. Limbo was never doctrine, just a theological theory developed as a means of addressing the problem of infants and other innocents who died without benefit of baptism. Limbo is not to be confused with Purgatory.

Julie, God doesn’t have an “age of consent.” Humans do.

]]> By: Julie O. http://www.worldwiderant.com/2007/04/21/hey-look/#comment-1509 Julie O. Sun, 22 Apr 2007 20:59:31 +0000 http://www.worldwiderant.com/2007/04/21/hey-look/#comment-1509 Why just babies? Why not underage children who are subject to their parents' will? And what does God consider the "age of consent," anyway? Why just babies? Why not underage children who are subject to their parents’ will? And what does God consider the “age of consent,” anyway?

]]>